But revising a judgment requires courage, especially in such a controversial case.
So, it's better to mediate if possible, try to mediate wherever you can... Like in real life, that case where mediation happened six times, each time lasting at least several hours.
That's because the first trial court dug a hole, and the second trial court saw it wasn't easy to handle, so they considered mediation.
Otherwise, anyone who's been in a lawsuit knows, when have you seen a second trial judge so eager for mediation... It's because it's really hard to judge!
If it could be upheld, there would be no hesitation; it would just be upheld.
Especially in the reasoning part, this is where a judge's capability shines the most. A good judgment looks impressive, accurately summarizing the dispute, logically tight, with precise legal application.
